http://nicholasarmstrong.com/2010/02/exif-quick-reference/ Sun, 11 Apr 2010 00:53:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://nicholasarmstrong.com/2010/02/exif-quick-reference/comment-page-1/#comment-141 Nicholas Armstrong Sun, 11 Apr 2010 00:53:06 +0000 http://nicholasarmstrong.com/?p=278#comment-141 Nice catch! I had missed the rational encodings in my original table; it has now been updated to indicate which values are stored as rationals (X followed by Y, as integers, where the value is equal to X/Y). Nice catch! I had missed the rational encodings in my original table; it has now been updated to indicate which values are stored as rationals (X followed by Y, as integers, where the value is equal to X/Y).

]]> http://nicholasarmstrong.com/2010/02/exif-quick-reference/comment-page-1/#comment-140 Curtis M. Kularski Sun, 11 Apr 2010 00:17:52 +0000 http://nicholasarmstrong.com/?p=278#comment-140 Your information is somewhat wrong in your table of values. F-Number and Exposure Compensation (called Exposure Bias by standard) may NOT be entered as single integers as you propose. They may only be entered as pairs of integers. No assumption about the denominator should be made. Your information is somewhat wrong in your table of values. F-Number and Exposure Compensation (called Exposure Bias by standard) may NOT be entered as single integers as you propose. They may only be entered as pairs of integers. No assumption about the denominator should be made.

]]>